HackerTube

THE VIDEO SHELF · academic hoax papers

Joe Rogan Experience #1191 - Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay

Joe Rogan interviews Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, who describe their hoax papers submitted to academic journals in grievance studies. The conversation runs about two hours and covers academic publishing, ideology and victimhood culture.

Why HN readers recommended it

HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining account of how easily fake papers get published and of problems in academic peer review.

This is a summary from the source dataset, not an endorsement by Hacker News or the video creator.

Video & recommendation details

Creator / channel
PowerfulJRE
Topic
academic hoax papers
Format
podcast
Level
general
HN recommenders in dataset
2
HN mentions in dataset
5
Recommendation years in dataset
2018–2019

These counts and years describe the included Hacker News records; they are not YouTube views or the video’s publication date.

From the original HN conversations

Excerpts from the recorded comments. Follow each source for the full comment and surrounding discussion.

  • The term "competitive victimhood" came to my attention after watching the Joe Rogan interview of Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay who pranked academic journals with research papers based on ridiculous premises. A must watch IMO [VIDEO]

    geomark on Hacker News · 2019-02
    In Jussie Smollett Story Shows Rise of Victimhood Culture
  • If you have not watched Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay on the Joe Rogan show you should. Very entertaining and shows how ridiculous these publications are. [VIDEO]

    geomark on Hacker News · 2019-11
    In Science Vigilante Calls Out Bogus Results in Prestigious Journals
  • > But does that justify what they did? Yes, it does. These journals are an absolute joke, make a mockery of any serious attempt to advance knowledge and understanding, and deserve to be pilloried. Their standards of rigour and review are shockingly poor and as …

    bartread on Hacker News · 2019-02
    In We need to talk about systematic fraud

Summaries, classifications and recommendation records are from the HackerTube source dataset. Read about this library and its limitations.